​

 

Deal of the Day



news




Powhatan leaders meet with Wal-Mart representatives
Published: August 18, 2009
image

Photo: Media General News Service
Illustration: Powhatan Today


By Michael Copley
Staff Writer

Powhatan County Administrator Carolyn Cios confirmed that county officials met Tuesday August 18 with Wal-Mart representatives to discuss the future of a 53 acre lot on Route 60. The site in question has long been speculated to be the future site of the first Wal-Mart in Powhatan.

Cios said the big box representatives preferred to keep the retailer’s name confidential, but she said she pushed them to “make this open” to the public. Cios said the representatives ultimately told the county to handle the issue as leaders saw fit. 

Edward Kidd is the attorney representing Wal-Mart. He said his client preferred to withhold its identity from the public until “everything is a done deal.” He said “there are still some things that need to fall into place and we don’t need to get people stirred up for something that might not happen.” But he added, “We think it is going to happen.”

Director of Planning Brandon Stidham said the developer is conducting a traffic impact study that has not yet been submitted to the county and he said the name of retailer will officially be announced when a rezoning request is submitted.

Kidd, who works for the law firm Troutman Sanders, confirmed that the rezoning application will likely be filed in a matter of months.

The lot in questions is located on the north side of Route 60, west of Route 675 (Page Road) and adjacent to County Line Tires and the entrance to Luck Stone.

A portion of the lot is in the 500 foot R-C Residential Commercial zoning strip that runs along Route 60, but Stidham said an estimated 1,200-1,500 feet of the property extends back into land zoned I1 Light Industrial.

That portion of the property zoned I1 Light Industrial would need to be rezoned to R-C Residential Commercial.

The traffic impact study going on now will be filed with the county before it is sent to VDOT for approval and Stidham said the county’s access management requirements are stricter than what VDOT requires. He said the developer will not be able to construct another crossover on Route 60; so if Wal-Mart does build a store, either an access road will have to be built to link in with an existing road, or the store will be accessed by an entrance onto route 60 that does not have a crossover.

Powhatan resident Greg Ownby addressed the board of supervisors Monday night ahead of the Tuesday meeting between county leaders and the then-unnamed big box representatives.

“We [residents] want you [county leaders] to understand how important” the big box issue is “to the people of the county,” Ownby said. He urged leaders to “Be forthcoming,” and requested that “you [county leaders] keep citizens updated. The more transparent you are the better… Make the people part of the discussion sooner rather than later.”

District One Supervisor Joe Walton thanked Ownby for his, and other residents’ concern, and he assured those gathered for the Monday night board of supervisors meeting that he and the board would “keep people up to speed on development plans. The last thing I would do is make an ultimate decision without the full public process.”

And District Three Supervisor Bob Cosby told the audience that “Decisions will happen publicly,” according to the law.

Walton added that “Until something is filed [rezoning application] there is no public action.”

Walton spoke on Friday about the meeting planned for August 18 and about his first conversations with the big box attorney.

He said he told Kidd, now known to be Wal-Mart’s representative, “to understand that this is going to get out. My priority is to the people I represent.”




Reader Comments


Werner Gutmann of Mill Quarter Neighborhood
Aug. 24, 2009, 01:34 PM

WOULD THIS BE GOOD FOR POWHATAN?
 
Wal-Mart Jobs Are Low-Wage and Low-Benefit
• In 2008, the average full time Associate (34 hours per week) earns $10.84 hourly for an annual income of
$19,165. That’s $2,000 below the Federal Poverty Line for a family of four.
• As of 2008, a full time Wal-Mart Associates earns 16% less than the average retail wage
• If an average full-time Wal-Mart employee chooses the least expensive family health insurance plan, they would have to spend over 20% of their income before the health insurance provided any reimbursement.
• In 21 of 23 states where data is available, Wal-Mart forces more employees to rely on taxpayer-funded health care than any other employer.
 
Wal-Mart Can Cost Taxpayers Money
• A 2004 study found that one Wal-Mart store cost tax payers $108,000/year for children’s health care and $42,000 per year for low income housing assistance—per store!
• Through a loophole in many state tax codes, Wal-Mart avoided paying $2.3 billion in state income taxes between 1999 and 2005 alone.
 
Wal-Mart Negatively Impacts Communities and Small-Businesses
• In Virginia, 60 cents of every dollar spent at a local store stays in that locality — compared to just six cents for every dollar spent at a big-box stores like Wal-Mart
• Studies in Iowa showed that some small towns lost up to 47% of their retail trade after 10 years of a Wal-Mart store moving in nearby in the mid 1990’s.
• In 2005, Wal-Mart real-estate manager Jeff Doss spoke about an oft-cited remark by company founder Sam Walton that Wal-Mart would not build stores in towns if the residents did not want them. “Were that the case,” he said, “we’d never build a store anywhere”.
• In towns without Wal-Marts that are close to towns with Wal-Marts, sales in general merchandise declined immediately after Wal-Mart stores opened. After ten years, sales declined by a cumulative 34%.
• Over the course of [a few years after Wal-Mart entered a community], retailers’ sales of apparel dropped 28% on average, hardware sales fell by 20%, and sales of specialty stores fell by 17%.
 
Wal-Mart Ties Up Traffic
• A 2004 study of estimated additional driving costs of Wal-Mart super centers in the San Francisco Bay area concluded that there would be up to an additional 238 million vehicle miles traveled per year.
• These extra miles traveled could cost communities in that area up $ 256 million in additional costs for infrastructure repair and environmental degradation.
 
Wal-Mart Harms the Environment
• In October 2004, the United States Federal Government sued Wal-Mart for violating the Clean Water Act in 9 states, calling for penalties of over $3 million and changes to its building codes.
• In May 2004, Wal-Mart agreed to pay the largest settlement for storm water violations in EPA history. The United States sued Wal-mart for violating the Clean Water Act in 9 states, calling for penalties of over $3.1 million and changes to Wal-Mart’s building practices.
• In 2004, Wal-Mart was fined $765,000 for violating Florida’s petroleum storage tank laws at its automobile service centers. Wal-Mart failed to register its fuel tanks, failed to install devices that prevent overflow, did not perform monthly monitoring, lacked current technologies, and blocked state inspectors.
 
REFERENCES
 
“The 2008 HHS Poverty Guidelines,” United States Department of Health and Human Services, 23 January 2008, http://aspe.hhs.gov/poverty/08poverty.shtml
 
“Table B-3. Average hourly and weekly earnings of production and nonsupervisory workers (1) on private nonfarm payrolls by industry sector and selected industry detail,” Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2 May 2008, http://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.t16.htm
 
UFCW analysis of Wal-Mart health plan, March 2008
 
“Disclosures of Employers Whose Workers and Their Dependents are Using State Health Insurance Programs,” Good Jobs First, June 26, 2007
 
“Everyday Low Wages: The Hidden Price We All Pay for Wal-Mart,” A Report by the Democratic Staff of the Committee on Education and the Workforce, 16 February 2004
 
“New Research Shows Wal-Mart Rigs the System to Skip Out on $2.3 Billion in State Taxes,” Citizens for Tax Justice, 4/16/07
Rocky Mountain Institute
 
David Meekle, Lebanon Daily News, 13 July 2005
 
Kenneth Stone at Iowa State University, “Impact of the Wal-Mart Phenomenon on Rural Communities,” 1997
 
“Supercenters and the Transformation of the Bay Area Grocery Industry: Issues, Trends, and Impacts,” Bay Area Economic Forum, January 2004
 
Supercenters and the Transformation of the Bay Area Grocery Industry: Issues, Trends, and Impacts. Bay Area Economic Forum
 
2004 Hartford Courant, 8/16/05
 
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, May 12, 2004, U.S. v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc., 2004 WL 2370700
 
Associated Press, 11/18/04
 
 
 
THESE ARE JUST A FEW!! FOR MORE FACTS, VISIT http://www.wakeupwalmart.com/facts/


qhgirl of cumberland
Aug. 24, 2009, 11:37 AM

A lot of folks talk about the risk to local business.. but really.. since we are already within driving distance of other big box stores.. aren’t they already in competition with a walmart, lowes etc?  I mean..people are just driving the extra 20 minutes further to go to those stores..

What commerce/business entity do people want to see in Powhatan.. If not a Walmart.. WHAT type of business should there be?  Multiple Dumps like Cumberland?  More rock quarries?  A 3rd food lion?  Should we try for a business park like Innsbrook?  We can’t be blind to the fact that progress is going to come this way… so what should happen?


Legal Question
Aug. 24, 2009, 11:30 AM

Invoke “The Brown Act.”


Angela Smith
Aug. 24, 2009, 11:01 AM

To PSB of Powhatan County ~ My hat is off to you! You have made a very good point about our county leaders destroying the very thing they promised to protect - our unique county. Ms. Cios is quoted as saying that they had the option of bringing this matter to the people, yet she chose to keep it secret. She supplied a letter to the No to Walmart group that was so full of half-truths and BS how can anyone take her or her staff seriously. I think we all need to seriously consider who we vote for in the next election and remember the lies that have already been told. Our so-called leaders have let us all down and they are only focused on the money aspect instead of protecting the “rural” enviroment that most of us love.


Jackie Taylor
Aug. 24, 2009, 10:47 AM

For all those that want the convenience of having a Walmart and everything else that comes with it, move to Chesterfield. You could live in one of those now defunct subdivisions that can be found between the two Walmarts on Hull Street…along with the other 10,000 people traveling the same road. Enjoy!

How can you all say that this will improve our tax base? Do you really believe that the sales tax generated will cover the increased use of emergency services that will include the hiring of additional deputies, dispatchers, etc.? What about the destruction of our roads due to the increased traffic…roads that are already in poor condition and the State can’t afford to repair. How many jobs will be gained in comparision to those lost due to the closing of our local businesses…with most of the owners of these businesses being residents. How many empty buildings will we have after our small businesses have closed their doors? Are all of you that want this store going to be out on Rt. 60 picking up the increased amount of trash??? What about the increased noise and air pollution. Walmart is NOT a good neighbor and for all those that want this thing I challenge you to take a ride to Hull Street and just look at the chaos!

Be careful what you wish for, you just might get it and then some!!!!


jeff of powhatan
Aug. 24, 2009, 10:07 AM

I am glad to see Walmart and hope that Lowes comes next. They do hold prices down and they have to be built somewhere. I am glad it is not another large bank being built. They are just alike in the fact that with all the lines they have only a couple will ever be open.


Ms.Reasonable of Powhatan
Aug. 23, 2009, 10:14 PM

I still welcome a Walmart being built in Powhatan County.  After having discussed this with several people, they suggested the Walmart be built a little farther west, between the 2 Food Lions.  That would be fine with me, and probably for the residents in the western half of the county and for Cumberland residents as well. Which business along Rt.60 will be forced to close? In many cases, it may improve their business exposure, e.g. restuarants, banks, and gas stations.


powhatan citizen of powhatan
Aug. 23, 2009, 07:32 PM

I’m a little late in following up with some of these comments, but just noticing cb’s comment about mine and I’m not sure I understand how I am a creeping vine.  I’m all for business’s coming to Powhatan. I think there should be incentives to bring in smaller more personable businesses.  I’d love to get up on a Saturday and drive a few minutes vs. 20-25 minutes to shop for clothes, shoes, gifts etc.  I’d love to see these smaller shopping areas in Powhatan full of these stores and other businesses that would keep the citizens shopping local and drawing in others from other counties.  And I agree with CB Walmart is just not the answer.


Powhatan Resident
Aug. 23, 2009, 07:29 PM

Who said you get to vote? The developers have already got this straight with our county government. We don’t run this county, they do. All this hot air just contributes to global warming.


John of Powhatan
Aug. 23, 2009, 06:57 PM

Sorry Seniorcitizenlover, I’m not moving.  I’ll stay to vote for Wal-Mart and Lowes.


Page 3 of 11 pages  <  1 2 3 4 5 >  Last »


Submit Your Comments Below

Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.