Deal of the Day



news




After months of deferral, public debate over Walmart set to kick off on April 6
Published: March 24, 2010
Read an electronic copy of the report detailing the estimated fiscal and economic impact of the proposed new Walmart in Powhatan County

By Michael Copley
Staff Writer

After months of delay brought on by Walmart’s repeated requests for deferral, the retailer’s rezoning application will be taken up by planning commissioners at their April 6 meeting- a long-awaited start to the public-hearing process.
At a meeting between the Powhatan Architectural Review Committee and store representatives last week, an attorney for Walmart indicated his client is ready to move forward.

The county’s architectural review committee has, for months, scrutinized elements of the proposed store design and met with Walmart representatives to push for a proposal that’s “a little less box,” in the words of one committee member, and that satisfies Article 31 of the county’s zoning ordinance- a measure “To encourage originality, flexibility, innovation in site planning and development,” according to the zoning ordinance.

Revisions of the store design focus on the front of the building and feature more stone and brick work- “the compromise we were able to provide,” according to a store representative- to give shoppers “a better approach to the store.”

Walmart representatives said their design flexibility is limited by the retailer’s new branding efforts; as part of a “changed vision and design aesthetic,” Walmart isn’t interested in trying to design locality-specific stores, a representative said. 

Most members of the county’s review committee said they are pleased with the changes they saw; “With something this large, the best we can do is change the front [of the building],” said one committee member.

But another said the changes Walmart has proposed don’t go far enough. “You’ve done the best you can do,” the committee member told store representatives, “but it’s not good enough for Powhatan.”

The architectural review committee functions as an advisory body for county officials and will be asked to provide a recommendation on the project. 

Powhatan recently paid an outside traffic engineering firm for a third party review of Walmart’s traffic impact analysis (TIA). That study by Martin Alexiou Bryson reports “mostly minor” discrepancies in Walmart’s TIA that aren’t expected to create significant changes in the results of that study.

That third-party review did, however, point to intersections in the area of the proposed building site and reported that “Due to the scale of this project, as well as the existing and future traffic conditions at adjacent roads and intersections, additional off-site improvements…should be considered.”



Reader Comments


PowGal of Powhatan
Mar. 30, 2010, 12:35 PM

Shop local?  Where exactly are you finding everything you need in Powhatan?  Shoes, clothing??  Am I missing some stores somewhere?  It’s the county’s own fault they are missing out on so much revenue.  There is a way to balance this if people would stop arguing long enough to figure it out.  Oh and the hometown experience doesn’t exist at the local pharmacies.  I moved my business to CVS the day it opened.


dk of Powhatan
Mar. 29, 2010, 08:49 AM

Shop locallly always - It is not easy but it can be done. It took a little time and effort, but everything I need is right here in our county now and without WalMart.  My efforts have given local business my money.  Is it really convenience you seek or laziness? 
I don’t have anything against bigger and better, but I do have an issue with taking business away from our local businesses.


AA of Powhatan
Mar. 29, 2010, 08:35 AM

Surely no one can be worried about Food Lion suffering.  They have two stores within a few miles of each other.  They’ve had a hold on the Powhatan market for years now and if they still want to be profitable they’ll be competitive.  The same goes for Powhatan and Plaza Pharmacies.  They’ll have to learn how to compete, maybe by capitalizing on that small-town, personal service they’re always lauding (though I’ve not been a witness to it.)  If you look around the Midlothian Walmart there are a lot of businesses that seem to be thriving.


Ex-Chesterfield Resident of Powhatan
Mar. 27, 2010, 08:34 AM

I left Chesterfield County 15 years ago to move to Powhatan for less traffic and virtually no noise and light pollution. My stress levels have gone down and I’ve been happier than I ever was in the 20+ years I spent in Chesterfield.
What Walmart supporters seem to forget is that they’ll have to offset the job and revenue numbers by the numbers of jobs and revenues LOST when local businesses close. The pharmacy and Food Lion at South Creek, which employ dozens of people, will surely suffer. The NET EFFECT will be much less.
Also, who’s to guarantee Walmart will hire Powhatan residents? Those jobs could be filled with folks from Chesterfield, Amelia, Goochland, Cumberland, and Henrico for all we know.
By allowing Walmart to build here, the county is as good as forcing all of us to become residents of Chesterfield. Would they want to live there?


carl taylor of Amelia
Mar. 26, 2010, 06:18 PM

The problem with Powhatan County is that the county and others dont want changes in powhatan ever.They complan about driving to MIDLOTHAIN to work or buy things but wont let wlamart come here for jobs and convince for powhatan people like me that cant travel far.Powhatan is a beautiful county but time for a change to live way better than before.We need walmart,hardees,buger king and alot more restnaurt too.lets see all these new places come here now… thank you carl taylor of Amelis


Jim of Western Powhatan
Mar. 26, 2010, 11:50 AM

R. Reese, A simple way to reduce your costs is to stop driving SUV’s.  I travel 35 miles into Midlothian each day to go to work in a small car to save gas.  You shouldn’t complain about fuel costs when your driving two SUV’s.  On top of that you want a Walmart in Powhatan so you can save money by not traveling as far.  It’s people like you who will turn Powhatan into Chesterfield.


Joseph of Powhatan
Mar. 26, 2010, 09:51 AM

R.Reese,

I agree, I think Powhatan County should FOCUS on jobs primarily. Jobs are CRITICAL. If business doesn’t employ a large amount of people that live right here in the county, then don’t do it at all. That should be our motto—focus on jobs and build our tax base so we can build and sustain and build our community for the long term.

Also, no short term jobs here—if you can’t offer a LONG TERM position (more than 2 years)  that’s going to last and prove it then don’t come here—there should be a law to deny short term or high turnover positions, there are too many of them—they don’t make money for the population and they don’t offer job security, nor do they help the county tax wise, because ultimately the working population supports the long term unemployed.

No small numbers of employment. If you can’t offer at least 10 jobs don’t bother coming here. There ought to be a requirement for a ratio of profit-to-jobs so we know we’re employing people in profitable locations.

Walmart earns a MILLION DOLLARS PER MINUTE—as do the gas distributors…There ought to be more than just a token few people working for a GOOD wage not just an average one there. If we’re going to export all of our money to China—the cheapest producer and make the most profit in return, then Walmart workers ought to at least live well while it lasts.

Joseph


R.Reese of powhatan
Mar. 26, 2010, 01:26 AM

I drive two suv’s quite a distance in and out to shop in chesterfield.  This gets quiet costly to me. I am looking forward to saving money on gas with the one stop shopping store. The benefits in large box stores such as sams will probably follow.  Why not spend our money here and let us benefit with new jobs to boost our county.


AA of Powhatan
Mar. 25, 2010, 02:30 PM

It’s Ms. AA actually.  I understand the arguments against Walmart, I do.  I personally abhor the place and haven’t set foot in one in ages.  I have many reasons for my feelings.  However, that does not mean I don’t see the value of having the Walmart in Powhatan for the many citizens who will/would shop there.  It’s a tough situation for sure, but in the end how can we say no to this kind of store but yes to others?  That just doesn’t seem fair.


Whoa Nelly of Powhatan
Mar. 25, 2010, 02:17 PM

One thing we need to be doing in Powhatan is charging businesses to do business here and generate some revenue from them. How about starting with gasoline ?

James River Petroleum charges 67 cents PER GALLON on average. Most of what your paying goes into their pockets. The gas station owners themselves make very little money at all, because they usually have a huge gas station mortgage to pay for at the end of the month.

That means for every ten gallons you pump, the distributor makes 3 or 4 dollars PER PATRON, not counting the cost of 100 gallons of gas it takes to get the tanker here. An 8,000 gallon tanker does a super amount of damage to the roads on a daily basis by the way. They then claim their tax money back from the IRS at the end of the month ! That’s how they make their real money, with your tax dollars. Where does it go ? Their pockets.

If 100 people pump 10 gallons every hour at a single gas station, whoa nelly ! The original cost of gasoline is typically around $1.97 per gallon at the terminals which are in Richmond. When the price goes down the distributors keep their prices up so they can make even more profit. They love it when the price goes up, because their profits go up as well. They hate it when the price goes down or when it gets cold, because you get more gas for your money.

Let’s levy a county mandated “Business Profiteering Tax” on gas stations - without a tax per gallon for citizens every time they pull up to the pump - the owners and distributors are swimming in money, we the county SHOULD be reaping the rewards from their profits ! We should be getting something for the TAX MONEY we’re spending to allow them to come here and take away our money.


Page 1 of 3 pages  1 2 3 >


Submit Your Comments Below

Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.