​

 

Deal of the Day



news




Bustos is in, but where does he stand?
Published: October 21, 2009
image

By Michael Copley
Staff Writer

Powhatan Today Staff Writer Michael Copley asked Bustos about the recent outcry over his appointment and about his plans for handling the issues facing the county in the immediate future:

Do you think there would have been the same reaction from citizens if you were a republican?
“I can’t answer that, there’s no way for me to know. I’d like to think that’s not the case. Those who spoke out really did want input. I thought the board did a great job explaining [why they handled things the way they did] and I think deep down people heard what the board said and understood where it was coming from.”


How will the board’s handling of the replacement process and peoples’ sentiment towards it effect your ability to represent the citizens of the second district?
“More than ever I need to try to communicate the best I know how- to talk to [residents] directly, whether its phone calls or emails or in person.  I need to communicate that I’ll take care of their needs. I was not elected, I was appointed, and I’ll always work with an eye to what Charlie would have wanted.”


Why did you not- as some called on you to do- turn down the board’s offer under the circumstances and push for an open process?
“I got a call Wednesday [Oct. 7] from the chairman of the board and was asked to replace Charlie. I had gotten to know Charlie and [Cosby] asked me to serve for twelve months and then face an election. In my heart, I never thought it was inappropriate. But now I need to reach out to everyone who feels disenfranchised by the process. I saw it [the board’s reason for handling the process as it did] the way the board saw it — it was seamless and fair. I did get second place. And I kept in touch with Charlie and I have a feel for what he wanted. It would have been more destructive if we had done it the way some wanted. I thought it made sense and now we can get the next twelve months over with. I respect the other opinion, I really do, but anything else was an unrealistic scenario.”


Because looking at the Powhatan democrats’ Web site, the second complaint that group takes with the current board is its failure to listen to citizens in the county. How will you work to make the board more transparent to fix the problems your political party has pointed out?
“As of this moment, my commitment to the democrats has to be viewed through the much more intense commitment to the residents of District 2. This is not going to be a democratic agenda. This is Charlie Green’s agenda. The democratic agenda will have to be put on the back burner for 12 months. And I think the [Powhatan Democrats] understand that. I have got to do this party-blind. My commitment is to every voter in my district regardless of their stripes.”


A lot has been made of the content that appeared on the Powhatan Democrat’s web site under your leadership. Your comment on the issue?
“I was not cognizant of the hurt that web site caused. We have some vocal democrats who enjoy their freedom of speech. But I bare full responsibility. Maybe the website went overboard. There probably was a line we crossed where we were hurtful. All we can do is say we’re sorry and move forward. You know I met Charlie on election day two years ago, and the dude was better. I was joyous the next day when he won. Nothing good will come from being this confrontational. I’m afraid that Web site caused some real hurt.”


Weigh in on Walmart.
“We’re still in the information gathering phase. Charlie [Green] wasn’t going to make a decision until he had tried to hear from everyone. All we’re going to do now [by conjecturing] is upset people. I’m going to listen to every citizen in District 2, or try to. I may have to go door-to-door again and ask people what they think. But always with one eye on what Charlie would have done. That’s my responsibility.”


Some think the county should cap building sizes. Some have suggested 50,000 square feet is an appropriate size to keep big-box retailers out of Powhatan. What are your thoughts?
“We’ll have to look at the comprehensive plan when it comes out and in light of that plan decide how to approach big boxes.
But I can’t speak about that before we see the comprehensive plan. The comprehensive plan is the sheet of granite everyone should march by. I encourage all residents to look at the plan when it becomes available and express how you feel.”



Reader Comments


Nonsense
Oct. 27, 2009, 05:07 PM

Is this some kind of joke?  What do ugg boots have to do with anything? Sound tacky to me.  Reminds me of the song these boots are made for walking.  The parties and there leaders have walked all over the people.  I’m trying to get educated about turning things around. I think we need a third party with some commmon sense.


W.E.
Oct. 27, 2009, 10:40 AM

Who even knows what the democratic and republican agendas really are. All it seems like they do is fight like cats and dogs over everything. Better for them to have cats and dogs as their symbols than donkeys and elephants.


resident of Moseley
Oct. 26, 2009, 11:19 PM

Is anyone else concerned about Mr. Bustos saying he would put the “Democratic agenda on the backburner for twelve months . . . [while supporting] Charlie Green‘s agenda.”  What does this mean? 

    How will anyone know what his views or positions are if he can go around saying: “I’m doing what Charlie wanted” for 13 months.

    Mr. Green’s memory should not be used like this.  Not everyone who knew Mr. Green agree on what he wanted.  Men, who knew Mr. Green for years, spoke in opposition to the appointment.  Yet these comments have been ignored.


Deer Watching of my truck
Oct. 24, 2009, 09:44 AM

Here is another egzample of librals hiding info from us,,,,

http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/135974/Mobile-use-is-linked-to-brain-tumours


Comrade Watching
Oct. 23, 2009, 11:28 PM

http://www.bing.com/search?q=obama+administration+mao&src=IE-SearchBox&Form=IE8SRC

http://www.unionfacts.com/articles/unionPolitics.cfm


Darrell Griffin
Oct. 23, 2009, 11:21 PM

Watching

It’s clearly obvious that you, like most liberals prefer to stick with rhetoric in lieu of facts. Or whatever fits the narrow prism of a predetermined conclusion. You have no clue how the RNC works in this county. Absolutely none whatsoever.

I have learned that most of the time, if you want insight into how the DNC works and operates, simply look at what they accuse Republicans of doing. Especially when invoking union bosses and comrades, last time I checked, it wasn’t the RNC in bed with the unions or having administration officials citing Mao Tse-tung.


Dear Watching of Powhatan
Oct. 23, 2009, 04:28 PM

Your words are most pious and resentful regarding the “prc”.  You are obviously trying to insult the county Republicans and I must say you have done a good job.  How in God’s green earth can’t you see this was not about politics, but about a fair way to select someone to fill Charlie Green’s vacant seat. 

Watching…you should seriously consider contacting a psychologist with a Master’s Degree to help you with your deep issues.  Maybe BLOOTER best describes your method of communication.


watching of Powhatan
Oct. 23, 2009, 11:32 AM

frum used the word wrong and it is spelled shill not schill as i have seen here

come come now, they tried the team approach as if there was any hist basis in political lore anywhere for that to work - candidates rise and fall on their own and parties and “teams” mean little to the voters that decide elections

who runs on a platform of preserving or creating a majority in the legis body they seek office in? where has that ever worked?

our dear comrades in the prc are supposed to be seasoned poli campaigners and smarter than something

the pezzonovante in the prc (union bosses) tried mightly to get the woman that challenged daniels on their ticket, bise as previously explained and managed to get tucker as they thought it would help them lead the county - but now one started up some ‘alternative to partisan politics’ all of a sudden after decades of trying to stay relevant the partisan ‘team’ way

that a potential candidate wouldn’t or couldn’t, who is already supposedly politically active, run for family reasons sounds like the HBO special Outrage

the peasants in the prc didn’t ‘see’ this, supposedly weren’t privy and weren’t expected to understand…..but they are supposed to be peasants


County Resident of Powhatan, Va
Oct. 22, 2009, 09:50 PM

watching

You seem to misunderstand.  People do not run for office, bec. they are Republican or Democrat or how their district votes.  Several people make the decision to run or not run based on finances, family or time.  It does not mean that you or a party support or oppose someone.

So, the fact that no republican ran against Bise does not make him a shill for the Republican Party. 

Fun though how that is the same word used by John Forum on the Democratic website before the website was taken down.


Brian French of Powhatan Today
Oct. 22, 2009, 08:39 PM

Personal attacks of any kind are not allowed per our terms and conditions. Keep them out of your posts or I will have no choice but to remove them.

Thank you,
Brian French
Powhatan Today


Page 1 of 4 pages  1 2 3 >  Last »


Submit Your Comments Below

Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.