Deal of the Day
news
|
Two families, two murders, two different trial outcomes Published: February 11, 2009 Beginning in the summer of 2008, Powhatan was shaken by a rash of violence that would eventually leave four people dead. Perhaps as tragic as any other aspects of the violence was the fact that two of the murders involved one family member killing another. Last week, both of those cases went before the court. On Aug. 29, Randolph Szenasy shot and killed David McCoy. The cause of the fight: sold timber rights. Randolph A. Szenasy was led into court unshackled Feb. 2 to face charges of first degree murder and the use of a firearm in the commission of a felony for the August 29, 2008 shooting death of Earl David McCoy. McCoy, 48, and his wife, Kathleen McCoy, lived in a home at 6300 Old Buckingham Road in Powhatan on land the couple shared with Kathleen McCoy’s brothers, Andrew and Randolph Szenasy. According to testimony, timber rights for the family’s land were sold to provide revenue to pay property taxes. Randolph Szenasy, 54, allegedly took exception to the sale and voiced his frustration to McCoy in the early morning hours of August 29. Kenny Matney, a friend of McCoy and Szenasy, told the court he was with the brothers-in-law the night before the shooting. He testified, that while holding a pistol, Szenasy told McCoy, “I’ve got something for you,” referencing the timber harvest that was planned to begin that day. McCoy reportedly tried telling Szenasy that he was not benefiting financially from the deal- that Szenasy’s siblings had arranged the sale. ![]() Randolph A. Szenasy A few hours later, Kathleen and David McCoy were eating breakfast at the home the Szenasy brothers shared on the family property. A neighbor, Hibbert Matney, was there that morning and testified that McCoy and Szenasy were “arguing about trees,” and at some point Randolph entered the home and returned to the front porch with a pistol behind his back. Matney said he was unable to take the gun from Szenasy and pleaded with him not to do anything. Kathleen McCoy was on the front porch also. She said in court that her husband approached the front steps and Randolph told him to leave, but McCoy continued towards him. Houston and Burnett Jeter, also longtime neighbors of the Szenasys and McCoys, went to the home a short time after the shooting and said McCoy was on the ground in front of the porch, and Szenasy was on the porch in a chair, drinking a beer and smoking a cigarette. The gun, Szenasy told them, was inside the house on a coffee table. Dr. Sandra Thomas, a Forensic Pathology Fellow with the Chief Medical Examiner’s Office conducted McCoy’s autopsy. She told the court the victim suffered three gun shot wounds- one to the right arm, one to the right chest and one to the abdomen. The cause of death was multiple gunshot wounds to the torso. It was also noted in her testimony that the shots were fired from an “intermediate range … close enough to deposit soot on the victim’s clothing.” After the Commonwealth rested, Defense Attorney William R. Blandford made a motion to reduce the charge against Szenasy to voluntary manslaughter, arguing the absence of rage and the presence of intoxicants eliminated premeditation. Commonwealth’s Attorney Bob Beasley disagreed. “Randolph was angry about the timber deal, he thought Dave was getting something over on him, and he killed him in cold blood.” The court denied the defense’s motion and found Randolph Szenasy guilty of first degree murder and felony use of a firearm. He will be sentenced next court term following a presentencing report. A violent encounter, triggered by a debt, cost one man his life and the other his freedom. David Woodfin Jr. described his uncle as a “father figure” who repeatedly took him in and gave him a job. But testimony Friday also showed Donald Malkemus Jr. to be harsh and extremely demanding of his nephew; and one night last summer, a relationship streaked with emotional abuse ended sadly. Onlookers crowded the Powhatan Circuit Court room Friday, to witness a man tried for the August 2008 murder of his uncle. David Woodfin Jr., 22, pleaded not guilty to first degree murder and use of a firearm in the commission of a felony for the August 1 shooting death of Donald Malkemus Jr., 49. “This is not a who-done-it case,” defense attorney Cary Bowen told the court at the start of trial. “There’s no question about who the shooter was. Instead, it is the nature of the offense” that demands consideration. Jandelyn Onufur was with Woodfin the night of the shooting. She and Woodfin were, according to testimony, in the woods behind his grandparents’ house walking her dog, when Malkemus’ truck pulled in the driveway. ![]() David Woodfin Jr. Woodfin didn’t want to see his uncle and was adamant about “staying where we were,” said Onufur, because of a $2,500 loan he owed Malkemus. But Onufur said she insisted they “head back to her car.” She said Malkemus initiated a verbal altercation with his nephew, “then Donald attacked David,” said Onufur. “He had him by the throat and was yelling at David about money.” “We don’t need to fight like this. I’ll get you the money,” Onufur remembered Woodfin telling his uncle. As he walked from the driveway to the house, “he kept saying ‘I love you. You’re my uncle.’” Other witnesses recall Woodfin muttering the same words. According to evidence, Woodfin entered his grandparents’ home through the side door, walked to his room, and retrieved a loaded 12 gauge shotgun from under his mattress. Onufur said she saw Woodfin exit the front door with a “long gun”, walk down the sidewalk, kneel and shoot three times at his uncle’s truck as it started to back down the driveway. He said he found three Remington 12 gauge shell casings about 12 feet from the victim. The shots entered the truck’s open driver’s side window and struck Donald Malkemus Jr. in the upper body. That night, when authorities arrived at the home on French Hill Drive, the gun was under the mattress and Woodfin was gone. He fled the property on foot after the shooting. David Woodfin Jr. took the stand Friday afternoon- the defense’s last witness. He said he was “mad, embarrassed, and scared” after the confrontation in the driveway- that the shots were “meant to scare” his uncle. He said he didn’t remember pulling the trigger and “didn’t think he’d hit Donald.” He ran, he said, because he was scared of what his uncle would do. Before the defense rested, Bowen again motioned to reduce the charge from first degree murder to manslaughter. “This is the exact situation that makes heat of passion arise,” Bowen argued. Judge Thomas V. Warren found Woodfin guilty of second degree murder and felony use of a firearm. Second degree murder carries a five to 40 year prison sentence. The court ordered a pre-sentencing report, and Woodfin will return next term for sentencing. Bowen said he hopes his client will receive ten years or less plus three years for the firearms charge. “We can’t complain,” Bowen said after the trial. “I’ve believed it was a second degree murder or manslaughter case the whole time.” |
|
DFGSV
Mar. 31, 2009, 10:23 AM
20 YEARS YEAH RIGHT THIS IS B.S…BUT IF YOU SHOOT SOMEONE IN THE BACK OF THE HEAD ITS DIFFERENT YOU ONLY GET 11 YEARS..THIS REALLY SHOWS HOW POWHATAN COUNTY IS.. boo boos son
Mar. 15, 2009, 02:20 AM
EVERYBODY ON HERE RUNNING YOUR MOUTH NEEDS TO STOP AND WORRY BOUT THERE OWN LIVES..DAVID IS A WONDERFUL PERSON AND YOU JUST HAVE TO LOOK AT IT AS A PERSON CAN ONLY TAKE SO MUCH BEFORE THEY SNAP..HE LOVED HIS UNCLE DONALD VERY MUCH BUT ANYTHING HE DID FOR HIS UNLCE WAS NEVER GOOD ENOUGH FOR HIM AND HOW WOULD YOU FEEL IF SOMEONE YOU LOVED VERY MUCH ALWAYS PUT YOU DOWN WHEN YOU TRIED YOUR HARDEST TO MAKE HIM HAPPY?..SOOOO…FREE DAVID WOODFIN JR..I LOVE YOUUUUU :):):):):):) OH YEAH! of moseley
Mar. 11, 2009, 09:24 PM
SHOULD HAVE BEEN MANSLAUGHTER,AND WHAT TROUBLE DAVID HAS BEEN IN WAS DONALDS FAULT, AND DAVID PAID THE PRICE NOT DONALD,AND THIS IS DONALDS FAULT, HE SHOULD HAVE STAYED HOME WITH HIS SONS. ...........
Mar. 10, 2009, 02:44 PM
FREE DAVID WOODFIN JR. MARCH 26 2009<3 DAVID SR of moseley
Feb. 24, 2009, 09:33 PM
TO: MIND YOUR BUSINESS, I DONT KNOW WHO YOU ARE, BUT THANK YOU FOR HAVING SOME COMMON SENSE. YOU MUST BE PRETTY CLOSE BECAUSE YOU KNOW ALOT! ANYWAY THANKS FOR YOUR COMMENT!! DAVID SR of moseley
Feb. 23, 2009, 11:29 PM
TO: UNKNOWN, OR SHOULD I SAY {COWARD}, FIRST OF ALL DONALD SHOULD NOT HAVE TAKEN THE LAW INTO HIS HANDS, AND TOOK LIL DAVID TO COURT OVER THAT LIL BIT OF MONEY. I HAVE KNOWN DONALD OVER 20 SOME YEARS AND HE HAS ALWAYS LIKED HIS MONEY,BUT THAT NIGHT WAS NOT ABOUT THE MONEY IT WAS ABOUT CONTROL! HE WAS MAD BECAUSE DAVID QUIT AGAIN. AND THATS BECAUSE DONALD DIDNT KEEP HIS END OF THE DEAL HE MADE WITH DAVID WHEN DONALD ASKED DAVID TO COME BACK,I WAS THERE I MADE THE DEAL. SO YOU {COWARDS}DONT KNOW NUTHIN! I LOVED DONALD AND HIS WIFE AND BOYS,AND SO DOES LIL DAVID. THIS SHOULD NOT HAVE HAPPENED,AND IM VERY SORRY IT DID! I WANT TO TELL ALL YOU BRILLIANT PEOPLE WHO I DIDNT SEE COME AROUND TO SEE KAREN AND DONALD IN THE TWO YEARS IVE BEEN BACK, THAT IF THE SHOE WAS ON THE OTHER FOOT DONALD WOULD STICK BYE HIS SON. SO IF ANY OF YOU AND I MEAN ANY OF YOU {UNKNOWNS}GOT SOMETHING TO SAY TO ME, COME OUT FROM BEHIND THIS COMPUTER SCREEN, AND TELL ME YOUR STORY. Mind your business
Feb. 23, 2009, 05:09 PM
Well UNKNOWN, being such a good friend of the “real” Malkemus family and all, maybe you should have shared your advice with DONALD before he decided to strong arm a young man that looked up to him, a power Donald held over David and ALWAYS abused. All over a few dollars. Donald never bailed David out of anything. He used and abused him. David didn’t live in Donald’s home for free, he worked all hours of the day and night for Donald. Never any free time for himself. David would quit working for Donald so he could try and have a life. Donald would come crying and begging him to come back with promises of more money and a truck to use because David was his money maker. Low and behold Donald all of a sudden had amnesia and didn’t remember his promises. You are right though. You don’t take the law into your own hands and this is a perfect example of WHY you don’t. Donald should have taken David to court over the money. David did make payments on the loan. It wasn’t as it he took the money and never paid anything, he had been paying it. Ask your friends the “real” Malkemus family about the things they illegally kept that belonged to David as repayment for the loan. David did not come after Donald, Donald went after him. His parents may not be perfect, but come to think of it I haven’t yet met any that are. I’ve seen and heard a lot that think they are, but wake up world your whole life could change in an instance. .............
Feb. 23, 2009, 11:36 AM
for one..unknown he has two good parents and actually its harder to only go see your kid in jail wnats a week. and i dont agree with second dgree i think it should have been manslaughter or heat of passion donald is 4 times the size of david just face it donald was a bully..i no the malkemus family like his wife and kids are going through alot and i feel for them but also does david you act like he did this on purpose and is proud of his self. he nos what he did was wrong and he feels really bad about it so stop running your mouth…and yeah he maybe should of went and ran in and called the cops but you have to think about it someone four times his size just choked him and then came after him with a leaf rake. i would be very scared also so if you dont have anything nice to say about it just leave your comments out. and really keep his parents out of it they really have enough going on and they dont your smart ass remarks. FREE DAVID WOODFIN JR….I LOVE YOU unknown of powhatan, va
Feb. 19, 2009, 09:02 PM
Yeah I don’t agree with second degree either. I was in the courtroom as well, there is no question, justice was not served. First degree murder is what Woodfin committed, no question. The real Malkemus family his wife and two sons I am sure do not agree with this verdict and have no sympathy for him at all, only family that did not have a relationship with Donald feel sympathy for David. You can not take the law in to your own hands, he should have picked up the phone and called the police while he was in the house not a gun, he knew what he was doing and we will pay the price. David has never taken responsibility for any of his actions ever, Donald always bailed him out of trouble, but I guess Donald will not bail him out of this, I guess his parents who were never around to take care of him will take on the responsibility. I guess it is easy to be a parent when you only have to visit your child in jail or show up in court. .............
Feb. 19, 2009, 10:37 AM
i think the case went ok but i still dont agree with the second degree..he is a good person and did not mean what he did. he loved his uncle very much and if all yall talked to him and heard his thoughts on it all i bet you wouldnt be saying the things you are saying like do what he did to his uncle thats wrong think about davids family when you say that stuff they are lost some one do you think they want to loose another person..all yall are very rude you need to stop gettin on here running your mouth and worry about your own family..the woodfin and malkmeus family are both going through enough let it go and mind your own bussiness…FREE DAVID WOODFIN JR. Submit Your Comments Below Commenting is not available in this weblog entry. |


