​

 

Deal of the Day



opinion




In VP debate, Palin was winner
Published: October 08, 2008

A. Granado, Media General News Service

The one and only vice presidential debate is over, and while some in the media have called it for Joseph Biden, and others for Sarah Palin, the Republican vice presidential candidate is the winner.

We don’t say this because she outthought, out talked or out argued her opponent but because she held her own in an event that some critics were saying would be the final nail in the coffin of her credibility.

Palin has not submitted to much direct scrutiny from the press since McCain announced her as his running mate. She has sat down for a small number of interviews and her performance has been underwhelming.

Often, during her previous interviews, she had seem flustered, unprepared and, well, inexperienced.

So, going into Thursday’s debates, some expected that she would display a continued lack of ability by not being able to to stand up to Biden or answer the questions posed to her.
Instead Palin showed poise, confidence and comprehension of the issues. She not only stood up to Biden but seemed comfortable challenging him.

For any doubters of the vice presidential candidate, there is little room for continued skepticism, at least as far as her ability to comment on important issues goes.
The question of her experience is still in the air, but Obama’s camp is in no position to be throwing any stones on that issue.
She certainly did not seem inexperienced Thursday night.

And as to whether she is qualified to be vice president… of course she is. So is every other native-born individual in the United States who is over 35 years of age and has lived here for at least 14 years.
The questions, doubts and skepticism about Sarah Palin should fall by the wayside as we go into the remaining days of the campaigns.

For those who saw the Palin interviews before Thursday and thought, “I’m not voting for that ticket,” they might have been singing a different tune Friday morning.



Reader Comments


Tiffany Clemmons of Powhatan, VA
Oct. 9, 2008, 02:05 PM

Since when is not “underwhelming” considered a win?  If she was being held to the standards that a male candidate would be held to, she would not be getting a free pass on her shortcomings.  Putting an ill-equipped, poorly educated woman on the ticket because of her gender is as sexist as passing over a qualified woman because of hers.

It is not Sarah Palin’s inexperience that disturbs me.  Her actual experience is frightening enough:  dragging the previously balanced budget of a small town into the red to build a hockey rink, allowing victims of rape to be charged for rape kits to be used to identify their attackers, and receiving earmarked federal dollars to be used for the “bridge to nowhere” that was never built. 

One night of winks and barbs is not enough for the questions about Palin to fall by the wayside.


UNLEARN
Oct. 8, 2008, 04:12 PM

“...For those who saw the Palin interviews before Thursday and thought, “I’m not voting for that ticket,” they might have been singing a different tune Friday morning.”

A. Granado…....huh?  You write fairly well, but thankfully you are in the shrinking minority my friend.  Please educate yourself.




Submit Your Comments Below

Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.