Deal of the Day



sports




Changes good for young players
Published: August 25, 2010

By Richard Carrier
Contributing Writer

With the melody and words of John Fogerty’s “Centerfield” still running through my mind I’ll turn on ESPN at to take in the experience of what I revere as the essence of sports. Forget the Yankees against the Red Sox, this is the real thing: Fairfield Connecticut versus Auburn Washington in the opening game of pool play in the Little League World Series. Eight US teams from Hawaii to Connecticut and eight International teams will compete from August 20 through August 29 for the title of Little League World Champion.

I’m on my annual soapbox preaching the simple joy of playing a game these kids represent. If you have to lay out of work or cut class; make sure and unplug the phone, in order to take in at least one game, Fogerty, Mantle, Stengel, Ruth and the rest of the baseball gods will not only forgive you these transgression, they’ll endorse them and you.

The purity of the experience at this level is revealed by Little League policies and the procedures at Howard J. Lamade Field in Williamsport, Pennsylvania. All seats for the entire 30-plus-game tournament are free (Lamade Field seats 10,000). Of course, there is no alcohol permitted, no large umbrellas, large coolers, laser pointers, noise makers (the dreaded Vuvuselas are specifically prohibited), liquid containers or and – I think this really sends a message – smokeless tobacco.

To assure that each squad that worked its way through regional play then jumped through untold fund-raising hoops in order to afford the trip to Williamsport (Just imagine how much money it took to get the International and Hawaii teams to Williamsport) gets their days in the sun, each team will play no less than three games. If your team loses its
first two games it is automatically crossed-over to International play, in another expansion of the Little League World Series experience.

Unlike Major League Baseball, the Little League World Series instituted instant replay in 2008. As a method “to overturn an obvious wrong,“ according to Little League Chairman of the Board, Stephen Lewin, questionable home runs and close plays at the outfield fence could be examined.

(At the time the Little League announced this implementation, Major League Baseball Commissioner Bud Selig commented that Major League Baseball was looking into the use of instant replay and would possibly have it implemented by the post-season- the post-season of 2008).

This year the Little League has expanded its usage parameters to include force-outs, tags on the base paths, missed bases and hit batters.

Umpires normally call for the replay, but if they fail to, and a Team Manager judges the call was in error, he or she may challenge. Twelve different camera angles should assure that the call is then judged correctly.

While there is no limit on the number the number of challenges a Manager may call for, he or she only gets one unsuccessful challenge during regulation play and one in extra innings.

I personally view the Little League’s World Series adoption of instant replay as its assurance to the youngsters that their efforts will be judged fairly, an unbelievably important assurance for a twelve-year old.



Reader Comments


Fr. Michael Lyons of Ganado, Texas
Aug. 25, 2010, 12:33 PM

Richard Carrier’s points about the positive aspects of Little League and its World Series are well-taken:  no admission charged to an alcohol-free, tobacco-free environment for baseball games played by children for fun and not for pay.

However, I have an opionion that differs from Mr. Carrier on the subject of Little League’s implementation of the concept of “reviewable calls” during LLWS games. 

Mr. Carrier wrote: “I personally view the Little League’s World Series adoption of instant replay as its assurance to the youngsters that their efforts will be judged fairly, an unbelievably important assurance for a twelve-year old.”

No, Mr. Carrier, Little League’s assurance that the players’ efforts will be judged fairly has long stemmed from Little League’s insistence that umpires be unpaid volunteers, the same as managers, coaches, and local league officers. In other words, Little League’s exhortation, from 1939 onward, has been that those who officiate the games should be motivated, like any other adult in a visible position in Little League (manager, league president, etc.) mainly for the good of the children and the good of the game. Umpires, like all other people in positions of authority (managers, league presidents), make mistakes. Until shown otherwise, I will believe their mistakes are honest mistakes, made in a fair and impartial manner, but simply miscalled. No technology can improve upon that.

As one who umpired almost exclusively in Little League for 33 seasons, I believe the implementation of the concept of “reviewable calls” flies in the face of the simplicity, and purity, of the Little League experience you spent the first paragraphs of your article describing.  Until 2007, the Little League World Series was still one of a dwindling number of high-profile sports events where what the officials called was final. Now, further television-driven complexities spoil the simplicity of the Little League experience.


What is really unsettling for me about the protocols for reviewable calls at the Little League World Series is that an off-the-field, impersonal “replay committee” makes the adjusted called based on technology.  At least in Major League Baseball and the National Football League, the on-field game officials are the ones to review and judge their own calls.




Submit Your Comments Below

Name: (Required)

Email: (Required)

Location:

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Submit the word you see below:



By clicking submit, you agree to our terms and conditions.